perm filename TAKR.TIM[TIM,LSP]3 blob
sn#672211 filedate 1982-08-10 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ⊗ VALID 00004 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 SAIL
C00003 00003 ∂06-May-82 0128 Mabry Tyson <Tyson at SRI-AI> MAS results for UCI Lisp
C00005 00004 Franz
C00006 ENDMK
C⊗;
;;; SAIL
(timit)
(RUNTIME 0.855)
(GCTIME 0.0)
T
(timit)
(RUNTIME 0.846)
(GCTIME 0.0)
T
(timit)
(RUNTIME 0.848)
(GCTIME 0.0)
T
(timit)
(RUNTIME 0.865)
(GCTIME 0.0)
T
(timit)
(RUNTIME 0.875)
(GCTIME 0.0)
T
∂06-May-82 0128 Mabry Tyson <Tyson at SRI-AI> MAS results for UCI Lisp
Date: 6 May 1982 0126-PDT
From: Mabry Tyson <Tyson at SRI-AI>
Subject: MAS results for UCI Lisp
To: rpg at SU-AI
TAK program with 100 different TAKs for UCI Lisp (version from University of
Texas running on SRI-AI Tops-20 2060 with compatibility package.)
Notes on this program: The SUB1 is generic and is not compiled in-line.
(TAK 18. 12. 6.)
Interpreted: 22.485 seconds
Compiled, no fast links: 5.124 seconds
Compiled, fast links: 1.099 seconds
(The slowdown for the first two results may be due to increased time to search
the OBLIST. I don't know why the third time is 7% slower than the recursive
TAK. It might be due to increased swapping from other jobs??)
-------
;;; Franz
I think they mean TAKR here.
∂08-May-82 2148 Kim.jkf at Berkeley updated mas benchmark results
Date: 8 May 1982 21:41:30-PDT
From: Kim.jkf at Berkeley
To: rpg@su-ai
Subject: updated mas benchmark results
Cc: Kim.fateman@Berkeley
I ran it with local functions and here are the complete results:
mas benchmark (tak benchmark using tak0 through tak99)
Lisp Opus 38.16,
Liszt 8.06
780 750
slow links 13.26 19.17
normal links 3.62 5.09
local functions 1.7 2.7
slow links = translink nil, fast links = translink on